Knox v. New York City Dep't of Educ., 100 A.D.3d 486 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2012). · Go Syfert
Knox v. New York City Dep't of Educ., 100 A.D.3d 486 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Tulsa Knox
v.
New York City Department of Education
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Nov 13, 2012.
Published opinion
100 A.D.3d 486
Published

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered December 7, 2011, which denied petitioner’s motion for an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to CELR article 86, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[*487] The motion was properly denied since respondent is neither the State nor a state agency within the meaning of the statute (see CPLR 8602 [g]; Hernandez v Hammons, 98 NY2d 735 [2002]). The fact that respondent performs a governmental function, namely the administration of public education, does not make it an agent of the State (see Matter of Apollon v Giuliani, 246 AD2d 130, 134-135 [1st Dept 1998], lv dismissed 92 NY2d 1046 [1999]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter, Abdus-Salaam and Feinman, JJ.