green
Positive treatment
Issue: statutory corroboration requirementNY ↗
Issue: defendant has waived claimNY ↗
0.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Durio
Furthermore, because there was no evidence adduced at trial from which it could be inferred that Vargas participated in the planning or execution of the shooting of Burgos, the court properly determined that Vargas was not an accomplice as a matter of law (see, CPL 60.22; see also, People v Strawder, 124 AD2d 758, 759 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Robert Lee Smith
v.
Robert Lee Smith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Nov 17, 1986.
Published
The sentences imposed were not excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). The sentencing court did not abuse its discretion in denying youthful offender treatment (see, People v Jordan, 115 AD2d 622). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.