Fulkerson (Thomas, Carolyn, James N., Dannielle L., Thomas W.) v. City of Lancaster, Manor Twp., Deck (Ross A.), Herman (Randy), 993 F.2d 876 (3rd Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Fulkerson (Thomas, Carolyn, James N., Dannielle L., Thomas W.) v. City of Lancaster, Manor Twp., Deck (Ross A.), Herman (Randy), 993 F.2d 876 (3rd Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“this action is essentially a tort case between citizens of the same state, and as such it belongs in the state court system.”
44 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: BODDY v. SIMMONS (paed, 2021-03-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) BODDY v. SIMMONS
E.D. Pa. · 2021 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
this action is essentially a tort case between citizens of the same state, and as such it belongs in the state court system.
discussed Cited "see" Becker v. ARCO Chemical Co.
E.D. Pa. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
Tobin, 936 F.Supp. at 290 ; see Carpenter Technology Corp. v. Armco, Inc., 808 F.Supp. 408, 412 (E.D.Pa.1992)(“routine work can and should be directed to low level attorneys”), aff'd, 993 F.2d 876 (3d Cir.1993)(Table).
discussed Cited "see" North Penn Transfer, Inc. v. ATD-American Co.
E.D. Pa. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
Finally, since Pennsylvania law provides that matters dismissed by a federal court for lack of jurisdiction may be refiled in the state courts without regard to the limitations period, my dismissal of the state claims will not prevent plaintiff from bringing the same claims in state court. 42 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 5103(b)(1); see Fulkerson v. City of Lancaster, 801 F.Supp. 1476 , 1486 n. 3 (E.D.Pa. 1992), aff'd without op., 993 F.2d 876 (3d Cir.1993).
cited Cited "see" Young v. Francis
E.D. Pa. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fulkerson v. City of Lancaster, 801 F.Supp. 1476, 1486 (E.D.Pa. 1992), affd, 993 F.2d 876 (3d Cir.1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mirek Magdziak, Administrator of the Estate of Tadeusz Glodek, Deceased v. David Byrd
7th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Fulkerson v. City of Lancaster, 801 F.Supp. 1476 (E.D.Pa.1992), affirmed mem., 993 F.2d 876 (3d Cir.1993); Hicks v. Leake, 821 F.Supp. 419 (W.D.Va.1992); Dismukes v. Hackathorn, 802 F.Supp. 1442 (N.D.Miss.1992); Britt v. Little Rock Police Dep’t, 721 F.Supp. 189 (E.D.Ark.1989); Timko v. City of Hazleton, 665 F.Supp. 1130 (M.D.Pa.1986). 1 In light of the unanimity of opinion in cases with facts similar to those that gave rise to Glodek’s accident, Byrd certainly violated no clearly established constitutional right of Glodek’s when he conducted the high speed chase without activ…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fulkerson (Thomas, Carolyn, James N., Dannielle L., Thomas W.)
v.
City of Lancaster, Manor Township, Deck (Ross A.), Herman (Randy)
92-1783.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Apr 27, 1993.
993 F.2d 876
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 78%
Citer courts: E.D. Pennsylvania (1)

993 F.2d 876

Fulkerson (Thomas, Carolyn, James N., Dannielle L., Thomas W.)
v.
City of Lancaster, Manor Township, Deck (Ross A.), Herman (Randy)

NO. 92-1783

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Apr 27, 1993

1

Appeal From: E.D.Pa.,

801 F.Supp. 1476

2

AFFIRMED.