Ontario Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Mahoney, 226 A.D.2d 1056 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 1996). · Go Syfert
Ontario Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Mahoney, 226 A.D.2d 1056 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Cited for
Where the assets of [the debtor-transferor] have been sold and commingled with those of [the transferee], a money judgment was properly granted as a substitute for those assets.no pin page on record · 2 citing cases listed
  • In re: Adelphia Recovery Trust, No. 09-0799 (2d Cir. Feb. 9, 2011).published
    (Where the assets of [the debtor-transferor] have been sold and commingled with those of [the transferee], a money judgment was properly granted as a substitute for those assets.)
  • Adelphia Recovery Trust v. HSBC Bank USA, Nat'l Ass'n, 634 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2011).published
    (Where the assets of [the debtor-transfer- or] have been sold and commingled with those of [the transferee], a money judgment was properly granted as a substitute for those assets.)
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“where the assets of the debtor-transferor have been sold and commingled with those of the transferee, a money judgment was properly granted as a substitute for those assets.”quoted beside the cite; not in this opinion · 2 citing cases listed
  • In re: Adelphia Recovery Trust, No. 09-0799 (2d Cir. Feb. 9, 2011).published
    “where the assets of the debtor-transferor have been sold and commingled with those of the transferee, a money judgment was properly granted as a substitute for those assets.”
  • Adelphia Recovery Trust v. HSBC Bank USA, Nat'l Ass'n, 634 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2011).published
    “where the assets of the debtor-transfer- or have been sold and commingled with those of the transferee, a money judgment was properly granted as a substitute for those assets.”
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Ontario County Department of Social Services, on Behalf of Colleen Mahoney
v.
Thomas E. Mahoney
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Apr 19, 1996.
Published opinion
226 A.D.2d 1056
1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5511

Order unanimously affirmed without costs (see, Matter of Drago v Drago, 138 AD2d 704, 707). (Appeal from Order of Ontario County Family Court, Harvey, J.—Child Support.) Present— Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.