United States v. Ruben Valdez, 451 F. App'x 679 (9th Cir. 2011). · Go Syfert
United States v. Ruben Valdez, 451 F. App'x 679 (9th Cir. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee,
v.
Ruben VALDEZ, Defendant—Appellant
10-10362.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Oct 4, 2011.
Unpublished opinion
451 F. App'x 679
Karla Delord, Assistant U.S., USPX-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Dennis Craig Jones, Attorney at Law, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Hawkins, Silverman, Fletcher.
Unpublished

MEMORANDUM **

Ruben Valdez appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Valdez contends that the district court erred by imposing a two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.2 (Reckless[*680] Endangerment During Flight). He further contends that the court’s findings in support of the enhancement were insufficient as a procedural matter. The district court’s determination to apply the enhancement was not clear error, see United States v. Reyes-Oseguera, 106 F.3d 1481, 1483-84 (9th Cir.1997), and its statements at sentencing were sufficient to permit meaningful appellate review, see United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93, 995 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.