Vittiglio v. Bd. of Commissioners, 238 A.D.2d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Vittiglio v. Bd. of Commissioners, 238 A.D.2d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Fusco v. Fusco, 36 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2007)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 414 Affirming summary judgment on failure to state cause of action3 citing cases
  • Fusco v. Fusco, 36 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2007).published
    Auth., 238 AD2d 413, 414 [1997]).
  • Sta-Brite Servs., Inc. v. Sutton, 17 A.D.3d 570 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2005).published
    Auth., 238 AD2d 413, 414 [1997]).
  • Slattery v. City of New York, 179 Misc. 2d 740 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1999).published
    Auth., 238 AD2d 413, 414 [2d Dept 1997].) In considering the cross motion, the court can consider evidentiary materials for the purpose of assessing the viability of the complaint.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Antonio Vittiglio, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, Patricia A. Vittiglio
v.
Board of Commissioners of the Great Neck Garden District
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Apr 14, 1997.
Published opinion
238 A.D.2d 413
1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3848
Published

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.), dated March 25, 1996, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557; Smith v County of Nassau, 232 AD2d 474). In response, the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate the existence of triable issues of fact with respect to their claim that the defendant negligently maintained the ice skating rink where the infant plaintiff was injured (see, Giaimo v Roller Derby Skate Corp., 234 AD2d 340; Byrne v Westchester County, 178 AD2d 575; Strauss v Town of Oyster Bay, 201 AD2d 553; Pascucci v Town of Oyster Bay, 186 AD2d 725; cf., Naim v Schwartz Bros. Mem. Chapels, 232 AD2d 383). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.