In re the Est. of Cavallo, 239 A.D.2d 187 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 1997). · Go Syfert
In re the Est. of Cavallo, 239 A.D.2d 187 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Estate of Ralph Cavallo, Jean Cavallo, Respondents Davenport Neck Corporation
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
May 8, 1997.
Published opinion
239 A.D.2d 187
1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4931
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Decree, Surrogate’s Court, Bronx County (Lee Holzman, S.), entered April 17,1996, which, to the extent appealed from, after a nonjury trial, directed that respondent-appellant register on its books 21 shares of its capital stock to petitioners within five days of delivery of the necessary documentation, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The Surrogate’s conclusion that, at the time of the subject transfers, there was no valid and consistently applied restriction on transfer (compare, Glens Falls Ins. Co. v National Bd. of Fire Underwriters Bldg. Corp., 63 Misc 2d 989, 990-992, affd 36 AD2d 793, lv denied 29 NY2d 482) is supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence in the record (see, Thoreson v Penthouse Intl., 80 NY2d 490, 495). The Surrogate properly rejected the argument that a later-enacted restriction should[*188] be applied retroactively. We have considered appellant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Petitioners’ argument for modification of that part of the decree favorable to appellant is not before us in the absence of a cross appeal (see, Matter of Blue v Wilkins, 71 AD2d 935). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Nardelli, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.