green
Positive treatment
published
Issue: predivorce standardNY ↗
Issue: requisite statutory factorsNY ↗
18.8 score
Cited for
At page 1033 Determining maintenance award based on statutory factors5 citing cases
- Stuart v. Stuart, 155 A.D.3d 1371 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2017).publishedTo the extent that the child was in college at the time of trial and Supreme Court specifically linked the husband’s obligation to pay 75% of the child’s college expenses to the duration of the child support award—increasing such obligatio…
- Smith v. Smith, 152 A.D.3d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2017).published Notably, “equitable distribution does not require equal distribution” (Fisher v Fisher, 122 AD3d 1032, 1033 [2014]).
- Orioli v. Orioli, 129 A.D.3d 1154 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2015).published The amount and duration of a maintenance award is left to the sound discretion of the trial court that has considered the statutory factors and the parties’ predivorce standard of living (see Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6] [a]; Fishe…
Other citing cases
- Reynolds v. Reynolds, 155 A.D.3d 1421 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep't 2017).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Martin Sanchez
v.
Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision
v.
Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Nov 13, 2014.
Published opinion
Clark, Garry, Lahtinen, Lynch, Rose.
Published
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Determination confirmed. No opinion.
Lahtinen, J.P, Garry, Rose, Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.