Greene ex rel. S.G. v. Camreta, 661 F.3d 1201 (9th Cir. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Greene ex rel. S.G. v. Camreta, 661 F.3d 1201 (9th Cir. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (26 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kirwin v. Kot, No. 4:22-cv-00471 (D. Ariz. July 25, 2023)
Treatment trajectory · 2013 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2013 2019 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases7 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sarah GREENE, Personally and as Next Friend for S.G., a Minor, and K.G., a Minor, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Bob CAMRETA; Deschutes County; James Alford, Deschutes County Sheriff; Bend Lapine School District; Terry Friesen, Defendants-Appellees
06-35333.
Docket on CourtListener (RECAP)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Oct 31, 2011.
Published opinion
661 F.3d 1201
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 22040
2011 WL 5143133
Mikel Ross Miller, Law Office of Mikel R. Miller, P.C., Bend, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellant., David B. Thompson, Assistant Attorney General, Richard D. Wasserman, Esquire, Office of the Oregon Attorney General, Salem, OR, Mark P. Amberg, Esquire, Christopher Bell, Esquire, Deschutes County Legal Counsel, Mark P. Amberg, Esquire, Steven Griffin, Esquire, Bend, OR, Christopher Bell, Esquire Janet M. Schroer, Mark H. Wagner, Esquire, Hoffman, Hart & Wagner, LLP, Portland, OR, for Defendants-Appellees.
Berzon, Bea, Gutierrez.
Cited by 23 opinions  |  Published

ORDER

In Greene v. Camreta, 588 F.3d 1011 (9th Cir.2009), we affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants Alford and Camreta. In relevant part, we held that Alford and Camreta violated the Fourth Amendment through their warrantless “in-school seizure and interrogation of [S.G.,] a suspected child abuse victim,” given the “direct involvement of law enforcement” in the child abuse investigation. Id. at 1030.

Subsequently, both defendants petitioned for certiorari, seeking review of our Fourth Amendment holding. See Camreta v. Greene, — U.S. —, 131 S.Ct. 2020, 179 L.Ed.2d 1118 (2011). The Supreme Court granted certiorari and vacated as moot the portion of our opinion addressing the Fourth Amendment issue. See id. at 2026.

Consistent with the Supreme Court’s instructions, we VACATE Section II.A. of our opinion and REMAND for further pro[*1202] ceedings consistent with the remainder of the opinion. We DENY Appellant Greene’s motion to file a supplemental brief.