Bungay v. Morin, 256 A.D.2d 462 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 1998). · Go Syfert
Bungay v. Morin, 256 A.D.2d 462 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Henry R. Bungay, IV
v.
Diane L. Morin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Dec 16, 1998.
Published opinion
256 A.D.2d 462
1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13485
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published

—In a visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Amodeo, J.), entered November 18, 1997, as directed him,to pay one-half of the legal fee of the Law Guardian for the children.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances presented here, the Family Court’s[*463] apportionment of the Law Guardian’s fee was not improper (see, Petek v Petek, 239 AD2d 327; Cilento v Cilento, 225 AD2d 648; Hughes v Hughes, 224 AD2d 389). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.