People v. Smith, 266 A.D.2d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Smith, 266 A.D.2d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases · …erred in admitting evidence of an uncharged crime without a prior ruling that such evidence was admissible . . . and failed to give appropriate limiting instructions to the jury, ⚠ not in text Topic ↗
7 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: People v. Wilson (nyappdiv, 2006-11-17)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" People v. Wilson
N.Y. App. Div. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
The court’s charge conveyed the proper legal standard to the jury (see People v Horace, 277 AD2d 957 [2000], lv denied 96 NY2d 784 [2001]; see generally People v Sanchez, 61 NY2d 1022, 1024 [1984]), and any alleged prosecutorial misconduct during summation did not cause such substantial prejudice to defendant that he was denied due process of law (see People v Smith, 266 AD2d 889 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 907 [2000]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
William Smith
Appeal No. 2.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Nov 12, 1999.
266 A.D.2d 889
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Lead Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Same Memorandum as in People v Smith (266 AD2d 889 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from[*890] Judgment of Monroe County Court, Bristol, J. — Violation of Probation.)

Lead Opinion

Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Scudder, Callahan and Balio, JJ.