Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Paul.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Paul Anchor | green | “he did not object to the testimony in question” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Small | green | “the indictment provided the court with the requisite clear indication that probative evidence could be discovered from the buccal swab” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Coldiron | green | “was needed to complete the narrative of the events” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Goossens | green | “the court made the requisite minimal inquiry into defendant's reasons for requesting new counsel,” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Watkins | green | “there is no significant probability that defendant would have been acquitted but for those errors” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Smith | green | “erred in admitting evidence of an uncharged crime without a prior ruling that such evidence was admissible . . . and failed to give appropriate limiting instructions to the jury,” | 3 |
| 7 | People v. Leonard | green | “any error on trial counsel's part in not objecting to and in not requesting a limiting instruction regarding the evidence of the past uncharged crime does not rise to the level of ineffective assistance of counsel when that error is viewed in light of trial counsel's 'entire rep…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.