People v. Green, 268 A.D.2d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Green, 268 A.D.2d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Zheng v. Warden Sing Sing Correctional Facility (nyed, 2019-09-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Zheng v. Warden Sing Sing Correctional Facility
E.D.N.Y · 2019 · confidence medium
The defendant failed to establish that the force or threat of force was capable of immediate exercise. o[r] realization.” People v. Hai Guang Zheng, 268 A.D.2d 443, 444 (2d Dept. 2000).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Fraser
N.Y. App. Div. · 2015 · confidence medium
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, no reasonable view of the evidence supported a finding that he was subjected to “the use or threatened imminent use of unlawful physical force upon him” (Penal Law § 40.00 [1]; see People v Morson, 42 AD3d 505, 506 [2007]; People v Hai Guang Zheng, 268 AD2d 443, 444 [2000]; People v Brown, 68 AD2d 503, 512-513 [1979]).
cited Cited as authority (rule) People v. Santalis
N.Y. App. Div. · 2003 · confidence medium
Furthermore, the County Court correctly refused to charge the affirmative defense of duress (see People v Hai Guang Zheng, 268 AD2d 443, 444 [2000]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Morson
N.Y. App. Div. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, no reasonable view of the evidence supported a finding that he was subjected to “the use or threatened imminent use of unlawful physical force upon him” (Penal Law § 40.00 [1]; see People v Hai Guang Zheng, 268 AD2d 443, 444 [2000]; People v Brown, 68 AD2d 503, 512-513 [1979]).
discussed Cited "see" Pryor v. Connolly (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Green, 268 A.D.2d 443 , 702 N.Y.S.2d 317 (2d Dep’t 2000); People v. Valentin, 211 A.D.2d 509 , 621 N.Y.S.2d 67 (1st Dep’t 1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Shawn Green
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jan 10, 2000.
268 A.D.2d 443
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 68%
Citer courts: N.D. New York (1)

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Friedman, J.), rendered January 15, 1997, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court properly sustained the prosecutor’s objections to those portions of defense counsel’s opening statement in which he attacked the reliability of the complainant’s identification of the defendant and suggested that the police planted evidence on the defendant to bolster a weak case. The remarks exceeded the bounds of an appropriate opening statement (see, People v Valentin, 211 AD2d 509; People v Glisson, 260 AD2d 245).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Santucci, J. P., S. Miller, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.