United States v. Mayra Martinez-Parra, 465 F. App'x 633 (9th Cir. 2012). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Mayra Martinez-Parra, 465 F. App'x 633 (9th Cir. 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Mayra MARTINEZ-PARRA, Defendant-Appellant
11-10109.
Docket on CourtListener (RECAP)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jan 5, 2012.
Unpublished opinion
465 F. App'x 633
Keslie Stewart, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Oakland, CA, Barbara Yalliere, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Jerome Matthews, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FPDCA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Oakland, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Goodwin, Wallace, McKeown.
Unpublished

MEMORANDUM **

Mayra Martinez-Parra appeals from the 27-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for escape, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Martinez-Parra contends that her fully consecutive sentence is substantively unreasonable. The consecutive sentence is consistent with the Guidelines. See U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(a). In light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, the sentence is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.