Castro v. Cepero, 299 A.D.2d 237 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2002). · Go Syfert
Castro v. Cepero, 299 A.D.2d 237 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Saul Castro
v.
Antonio Cepero, Jr.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Nov 19, 2002.
Published opinion
299 A.D.2d 237
2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11212
Published

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered May 1, 2002, which[*238] denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly denied since it may be reasonably inferred from the evidence that plaintiff, while bicycling, skidded and fell, by reason of dirt tracked onto the street from defendants’ steeply pitched intersecting dirt driveway (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853; Rose v Da Ecib USA, 259 AD2d 258, 259; Sheppard Intl, v Vogel, 147 AD2d 351, 352). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.