Dunavin v. Travis, 308 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Dunavin v. Travis, 308 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Howard v. Selsky (nyappdiv, 2004-04-08)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Howard v. Selsky
N.Y. App. Div. · 2004 · confidence medium
The determination is supported by substantial evidence as provided by the nephew’s letters to petitioner identifying inmates who had made payments to the nephew, the prearranged meeting between petitioner and his nephew, the heroin in the nephew’s possession just prior to the prearranged meeting, and the nephew’s statement against his penal interest admitting that he brought the heroin into the facility to deliver it to petitioner at petitioner’s direction (see Matter of Simpson v Goord, 308 AD2d 641, 642 [2003]; Matter of Lopez v Goord, 306 AD2d 715, 715 [2003]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Richard E. Dunavin
v.
Brion D. Travis, as Chair of the New York State Division of Parole
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Sep 18, 2003.
308 A.D.2d 641
2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9537
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Connor, J.), entered September 18, 2002 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole since the parole release determination giving rise to this proceeding and his request for parole release has again been denied. Given petitioner’s subsequent appearance before the Board, the instant matter is now moot and must be dismissed (see Matter of Boddie v New York State Div. of Parole, 306 AD2d 661 [2003]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.