Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
36 New York opinions name it 1 courts 1898–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Baldigreen2 sentences2021Thus, viewing the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of the case in totality and as of the time of the representation, we conclude that defendant received meaningful representation ( see People v Tetro , 175 AD3d 1784 , 1786 [4th Dept 2019]; People v Withrow , 170 AD3d 1578 , 1579 [4th Dept 2019], lv denied 34 NY3d 940 [2019], reconsideration denied 34 NY3d 1020 [2019]; see generally Baldi , 54 NY2d at 147 ). 1983Moreover, the record discloses that defense counsel did, in fact, provide the defendant with meaningful representation (see People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 ; People v Lakes, 86 AD2d 618 ). | 2 | 3 |
People v. Anthonygreen2 sentences2018As such, we find no merit in defendant's assertion that he was deprived of meaningful representation ( see People v Anthony , 152 AD3d at 1053-1054; People v Hook , 80 AD3d 881, 883-884 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 806 [2011]). 2018As such, we find no merit in defendant's assertion that he was deprived of meaningful representation ( see People v Anthony , 152 AD3d at 1053-1054; People v Hook , 80 AD3d 881, 883-884 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 806 [2011]). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Hookgreen2 sentences2018As such, we find no merit in defendant's assertion that he was deprived of meaningful representation ( see People v Anthony , 152 AD3d at 1053-1054; People v Hook , 80 AD3d 881, 883-884 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 806 [2011]). 2018As such, we find no merit in defendant's assertion that he was deprived of meaningful representation ( see People v Anthony , 152 AD3d at 1053-1054; People v Hook , 80 AD3d 881, 883-884 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 806 [2011]). | 2 | 2 |
Matter of Dushain v. Annuccigreen1 sentence2019Contrary to petitioner's claim, the record discloses that the hearing was timely commenced within seven days of the misbehavior report that resulted in his confinement ( see 7 NYCRR 251-5.1 [a]; Matter of Dushain v Annucci , 152 AD3d 1120, 1121 [2017]). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Abaregreen1 sentence2018Accordingly, defendant did not receive the ineffective assistance of counsel ( see People v Ackerman , 141 AD3d 948, 950-951 [2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1181 [2017]; People v Bowman , 139 AD3d 1251, 1252-1253 [2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 927 [2016]; People v Abare , 86 AD3d 803, 806 [2011], lv denied 19 NY3d 861 [2012]). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Ackermangreen1 sentence2018Accordingly, defendant did not receive the ineffective assistance of counsel ( see People v Ackerman , 141 AD3d 948, 950-951 [2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1181 [2017]; People v Bowman , 139 AD3d 1251, 1252-1253 [2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 927 [2016]; People v Abare , 86 AD3d 803, 806 [2011], lv denied 19 NY3d 861 [2012]). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Bowmangreen1 sentence2018Accordingly, defendant did not receive the ineffective assistance of counsel ( see People v Ackerman , 141 AD3d 948, 950-951 [2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1181 [2017]; People v Bowman , 139 AD3d 1251, 1252-1253 [2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 927 [2016]; People v Abare , 86 AD3d 803, 806 [2011], lv denied 19 NY3d 861 [2012]). | 1 | 1 |
The People v. Louis Speaksgreen1 sentence2017We find that “the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of [this] case, viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, reveal that [defense counsel] provided meaningful representation” (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]; accord People v Speaks, 28 NY3d 990, 992 [2016]; People v Kalina, 149 AD3d 1264, 1267 [2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 1092 [2017]). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Kalinagreen1 sentence2017We find that “the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of [this] case, viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, reveal that [defense counsel] provided meaningful representation” (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]; accord People v Speaks, 28 NY3d 990, 992 [2016]; People v Kalina, 149 AD3d 1264, 1267 [2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 1092 [2017]). | 1 | 1 |
Tafari v. Fischergreen1 sentence2016We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claim that he was improperly denied the right to call witnesses, including an unidentified investigator from the Inspector General’s office concerning petitioner’s unresolved grievances, and find them to be unavailing (see Matter of Tafari v Fischer, 93 AD3d 1054, 1054-1055 [2012], lv dismissed 19 NY3d 1007 [2012]; compare Matter of Lopez v Fischer, 100 AD3d 1069, 1069 [2012]). | 1 | 1 |
Lopez v. Fischergreen1 sentence2016We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claim that he was improperly denied the right to call witnesses, including an unidentified investigator from the Inspector General’s office concerning petitioner’s unresolved grievances, and find them to be unavailing (see Matter of Tafari v Fischer, 93 AD3d 1054, 1054-1055 [2012], lv dismissed 19 NY3d 1007 [2012]; compare Matter of Lopez v Fischer, 100 AD3d 1069, 1069 [2012]). | 1 | 1 |
Harding v. Prackgreen1 sentence2016Furthermore, the record discloses that the hearing was conducted in a fair and impartial manner, and there is nothing to suggest that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination flowed from any alleged bias (see Matter of Paddyfote v Fischer, 118 AD3d 1240, 1241 [2014]; Matter of Harding v Prack, 118 AD3d 1231, 1232 [2014]). | 1 | 1 |
Paddyfote v. Fischergreen1 sentence2016Furthermore, the record discloses that the hearing was conducted in a fair and impartial manner, and there is nothing to suggest that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination flowed from any alleged bias (see Matter of Paddyfote v Fischer, 118 AD3d 1240, 1241 [2014]; Matter of Harding v Prack, 118 AD3d 1231, 1232 [2014]). | 1 | 1 |
Jones v. Bellamygreen1 sentence2012In view of this, we cannot conclude that the denial of petitioner’s grievance was arbitrary, capricious or irrational (see Matter of Jones v Bellamy, 80 AD3d 1029, 1030 [2011]). | 1 | 1 |
Hynes v. Goordgreen1 sentence2008Likewise, there is no merit to petitioner’s claim that he was denied adequate employee assistance inasmuch as the assistant could not produce documents that did not exist (see Matter of Roye v Goord, 34 AD3d 1134 [2006]; Matter of Hynes v Goord, 30 AD3d 652, 653 [2006]). | 1 | 1 |
Davis v. Goordgreen1 sentence2008Contrary to petitioner’s claim, the record discloses that the hearing was commenced and completed in a timely manner insofar as appropriate extensions were obtained by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Davis v Goord, 34 AD3d 1027,1028 [2006]; Matter of Berry v Goord, 13 AD3d 947 [2004]; see also 7 NYCRR 251-5.1 [a], [b]). | 1 | 1 |
Evans v. Goordgreen1 sentence2007Moreover, our review of the record discloses that the hearing was conducted in a fair and impartial manner and the determination did not flow from any alleged bias on the part of the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Evans v Goord, 41 AD3d 1127, 1128 [2007] ). | 1 | 1 |
| Salaam v. Goordgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Goncalves v. Donnellygreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Scottgreen | 1 | 1 |
Marsala v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Systemsgreen1 sentence2005Moreover, the detailed misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who authored it, together with the testimony of the other correction officers on duty on the night of the incident, provide substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt (see Matter of Knight v McGinnis, 14 AD3d 984, 984 [2005]; Matter of Goncalves v Donnelly, 9 AD3d 721, 721 [2004]). | 1 | 1 |
Odome v. Goordgreen1 sentence2005Initially, petitioner’s contention that the Hearing Officer was biased is unpersuasive as the record discloses that the hearing was conducted in a fair and impartial manner and there is no indication that the determination flowed from any alleged bias (see Matter of Odome v Goord, 14 AD3d 975, 976 [2005]; Matter of Salaam v Goord, 8 AD3d 776, 777 [2004]). | 1 | 1 |
| Johnson v. Goordgreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Hobotgreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Johnsongreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Powellgreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Noblegreen | 1 | 1 |
| In re Feldmangreen | 1 | 1 |
| Pell v. Board of Educationgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. FACEN
green
2 sentences2018As such, we find no merit in defendant's assertion that he was deprived of meaningful representation ( see People v Anthony , 152 AD3d at 1053-1054; People v Hook , 80 AD3d 881, 883-884 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 806 [2011]). 2018As such, we find no merit in defendant's assertion that he was deprived of meaningful representation ( see People v Anthony , 152 AD3d at 1053-1054; People v Hook , 80 AD3d 881, 883-884 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 806 [2011]). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
People v. Horan
green
2 sentences2002With regard to defendant’s postconviction motion, the record discloses that defense counsel provided meaningful representation and there is nothing to demonstrate that any of the alleged deficiencies in the assistance provided by counsel prejudiced defendant (see People v Horan, 290 AD2d 880, 884-886 ). 2002With regard to defendant’s postconviction motion, the record discloses that defense counsel provided meaningful representation and there is nothing to demonstrate that any of the alleged deficiencies in the assistance provided by counsel prejudiced defendant (see, People v Horan, 290 AD2d 880, 884-886 ). | 2 | 2002–2002 |
People v. Droz
green
2 sentences1985Nonetheless, the record discloses that the defense attorney was familiar with the case, put up a vigorous defense and displayed a good working knowledge of basic principles of criminal law and procedure (see, People v Droz, 39 NY2d 457 ; People v Haire, 96 AD2d 1110 ). 1980Considered as a whole we are not persuaded that he failed to exhibit the required "reasonable competence.” (See People v Aiken, 45 NY2d 394 ; cf. People v Droz, 39 NY2d 457, 462 ; People v La Bree, 34 NY2d 257 ; People v Bennett, 29 NY2d 462 .) Nor do we agree that defendant was denied a fair trial by various actions of the Assistant District Attorney challenged on this appeal. | 2 | 1980–1985 |
Zheng v. City of New York
green
1 sentence2018Accordingly, defendant did not receive the ineffective assistance of counsel ( see People v Ackerman , 141 AD3d 948, 950-951 [2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1181 [2017]; People v Bowman , 139 AD3d 1251, 1252-1253 [2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 927 [2016]; People v Abare , 86 AD3d 803, 806 [2011], lv denied 19 NY3d 861 [2012]). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
People v. Beharry
green
1 sentence2018Accordingly, defendant did not receive the ineffective assistance of counsel ( see People v Ackerman , 141 AD3d 948, 950-951 [2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1181 [2017]; People v Bowman , 139 AD3d 1251, 1252-1253 [2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 927 [2016]; People v Abare , 86 AD3d 803, 806 [2011], lv denied 19 NY3d 861 [2012]). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Trimble v. State
green
1 sentence2018Accordingly, defendant did not receive the ineffective assistance of counsel ( see People v Ackerman , 141 AD3d 948, 950-951 [2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1181 [2017]; People v Bowman , 139 AD3d 1251, 1252-1253 [2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 927 [2016]; People v Abare , 86 AD3d 803, 806 [2011], lv denied 19 NY3d 861 [2012]). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
People v. Grefer
green
1 sentence2017We find that “the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of [this] case, viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, reveal that [defense counsel] provided meaningful representation” (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]; accord People v Speaks, 28 NY3d 990, 992 [2016]; People v Kalina, 149 AD3d 1264, 1267 [2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 1092 [2017]). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
People ex rel. Burr v. Rock
neutral
1 sentence2016We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claim that he was improperly denied the right to call witnesses, including an unidentified investigator from the Inspector General’s office concerning petitioner’s unresolved grievances, and find them to be unavailing (see Matter of Tafari v Fischer, 93 AD3d 1054, 1054-1055 [2012], lv dismissed 19 NY3d 1007 [2012]; compare Matter of Lopez v Fischer, 100 AD3d 1069, 1069 [2012]). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Becker v. Goord
green
1 sentence2008Contrary to petitioner’s claim, the record discloses that the hearing was commenced and completed in a timely manner insofar as appropriate extensions were obtained by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Davis v Goord, 34 AD3d 1027,1028 [2006]; Matter of Berry v Goord, 13 AD3d 947 [2004]; see also 7 NYCRR 251-5.1 [a], [b]). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Stewart v. Hartnett
green
1 sentence2008Likewise, there is no merit to petitioner’s claim that he was denied adequate employee assistance inasmuch as the assistant could not produce documents that did not exist (see Matter of Roye v Goord, 34 AD3d 1134 [2006]; Matter of Hynes v Goord, 30 AD3d 652, 653 [2006]). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
People v. Bingham
green
1 sentence2005Lastly, we decline to review defendant’s challenge to the severity of his sentence given his voluntary, intelligent and knowing plea and waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Travis, 12 AD3d 784 [2004]; People v Scott, supra at 718 ). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
| Matter of Shapiro Realty Co. v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Concourse Nursing Home v. State green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Jackson v. Portuondo green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Dunavin v. Travis green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| People v. Mejias green | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| People v. Diaz green | 1 | 2002–2002 |
| People v. Hanley green | 1 | 2002–2002 |
| People v. Decker neutral | 1 | 2000–2000 |
| People v. Hayes green | 1 | 2000–2000 |
| People v. Barber green | 1 | 1999–1999 |
| Bryant v. Mann neutral | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| People v. English green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| People v. Washington green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| People v. Keller green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| People v. Fish green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| People v. Feliciano green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| People v. Strempack green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| People v. Strempack green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Ortiz v. Coughlin green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| People v. Hilts green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Gunn v. Blum green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| Matter of Currier v. Planning Bd. of the Town of Huntington green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| Marx v. Planning Board of Mill Neck green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| Koncelik v. Planning Board green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| Sang Moon Kim v. Ambach green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| People v. Delfs neutral | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| People v. Macerola green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| People v. Haire green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Patterson v. New York green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.