neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
published
Issue: face defenseMI ↗
Issue: good cause exceptionPA ↗
0.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1903 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1903
1964
2026
Cited for
No citing cases on record.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Commonwealth
v.
Peter Valsalka, alias Wassel
v.
Peter Valsalka, alias Wassel
Appeal, No. 100.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Apr 19, 1897.
Published opinion
Eugene Ward, for appellant., T>. A. Fell, Jr., district attorney, and Ralph Wadhams, assistant district attorney, for appellee.
Cubiam, Dean, Fell, Green, Mitchell, Williams.
Cited by 16 opinions | Published
Per Cubiam,
We are clearly of opinion that all the assignments of error are entirely without merit. They were all considered by the learned judge of the court below in his opinion on the motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment. That opinion is a most exhaustive and elaborate treatment of all the subjects involved in the -present contention, and we are well satisfied with its reasoning and conclusions. We do not think it necessary to repeat them and we, therefore, affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in the opinion.
The judgment of the court below is affirmed, and it is ordered that the record be remitted for the purpose of execution.