In re Est. of Rogers, 39 A. 1109 (Pa. 1898). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Est. of Rogers, 39 A. 1109 (Pa. 1898). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Estate of Charles H. Rogers, Appeal of Charles R. Rogers, Frank G. Rogers and William Rudolph Smith
Appeal, No. 429.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Apr 11, 1898.
Published opinion
39 A. 1109
1898 Pa. LEXIS 735
William Rudolph Smith, for appellants,, Charles Biddle and John Gr. Johnson, for appellees.
Dean, Fell, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Pee.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Pee Curiam,

Undoubtedly it was for the best interest of the estate of the decedent that the decree of sale of the property in question should be made. It is perfectly clear also that the power of sale conferred upon the executors and trustees by the will of the testator was amply sufficient to justify the sale by them. It em[*437]braced the whole of the testator’s real estate of which this property was a part, and the learned court below was entirely right in granting the order.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed.