Commonwealth ex rel. Maryanski v. Myers, 189 A.2d 305 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1963). · Go Syfert
Commonwealth ex rel. Maryanski v. Myers, 189 A.2d 305 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“a writ of habeas corpus cannot be resorted to or used as a substitute for an appeal or writ of error, or for a motion for a new trial”
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Com. v. Ross, S. (pasuperct, 2022-03-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Com. v. Ross, S.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2022 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
a writ of habeas corpus cannot be resorted to or used as a substitute for an appeal or writ of error, or for a motion for a new trial
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Commonwealth ex rel. Maryanski
v.
Myers
Appeal, No. 382.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Mar 19, 1963.
189 A.2d 305
1963 Pa. Super. LEXIS 600
Thomas Maryanski, appellant, in propria persona., Arthur J. Marion and Arlen Specter, Assistant District Attorneys, F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, Jr., First Assistant District Attorney, and James G. Crumlish, Jr., District Attorney, for appellee.
Ervin, Flood, Montgomery, Rhodes, Watkins, Woodside, Wright.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The order of the court below dismissing petition for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Sporkin of the Court of Common Pleas No. 2 of Philadelphia County, as reported in 29 Pa. D. & C. 2d 358.