Raymond v. Russell, 9 N.E. 544 (Mass. 1887). · Go Syfert
Raymond v. Russell, 9 N.E. 544 (Mass. 1887). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Cited for
At page 544 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Organovo Holdings, Inc. v. Dimitrov, 162 A.3d 102 (Del. Ch. 2017).published
    Del. 1904); Reyes v. Middleton, 36 Fla. 99 , 17 So. 937 , 939 (1895); Raymond v. Russell, 143 Mass. 295 , 9 N.E. 544, 544 (1887); Flint v. Hutchinson Smoke-Burner Co., 110 Mo. 492 , 19 S.W. 804, 806 (1892); Allegretti Chocolate Cream Co. v…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
George J. Raymond
v.
Edward Russell & others
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
Jan 7, 1887.
Published opinion
9 N.E. 544
1887 Mass. LEXIS 290
W. C. Cogswell, for the plaintiff., F. W. Hutchins, for the defendants.
Morton.
Cited by 13 opinions  |  Published
Morton, C. J.

It is not within the jurisdiction of a court of equity to restrain by injunction representations as to the character and standing of the plaintiff, or as to his property, although such representations may be false, if there is no breach of trust or of contract involved. Boston Diatite Co. v. Florence Manuf. Co. 114 Mass. 69, .and cases cited. Whitehead v. Kitson, 119 Mass. 484. Prudential Assur. Co. v. Knott, L. R,. 10 Ch. 142.

■ The bill before us alleges that the defendants have published, and intend to publish in the future, the name and business standing of the plaintiff in the records and books of a mercantile agency. It does not even allege that the -representations are false or malicious. If he has any remedy, which we do not mean to intimate, it is by an action at law. The bill does not state a cáse within the equity jurisdiction of the court.

Bill dismissed.