Dedrick v. Eggleston, 8 F.3d 22 (5th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Dedrick v. Eggleston, 8 F.3d 22 (5th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
86 citation events (39 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Lewis v. Seashore (laed, 2025-07-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Lewis v. Seashore
E.D. La. · 2025 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
in order for a private right of action to exist under a criminal statute, there must be 'a statutory basis for inferring that a civil cause of action of some sort lay in favor of someone.
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Allen Thomas v. Tekle Abebe
5th Cir. · 2020 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
in order for a private right of action to exist under a criminal statute, there must be 'a statutory basis for inferring that a civil cause of action of some sort lay in favor of someone.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Cantu v. Gonzales
W.D. Tex. · 2025 · confidence medium
Ali v. Shabazz, 8 F.3d 22, at *1 (5th Cir. 1993); Chaney v. Races and Aces, 590 F. App’x 327, 330 (5th Cir. 2014). 14 While Plaintiff also appears to assert a claim against Judge Gonzales under Section 1983 and seeks damages, but see ECF No. 10 at 14 (rejecting any claimed relief against Judge Gonzales aside from criminal penalties), he does not assert a single new allegation in support of his claims against Judge Gonzales, nor does not explain what new allegations support this theory.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Atkins v. Aiken
N.D. Tex. · 2025 · confidence medium
As for the federal criminal statutes, 18 U.S.C. §§ “241 and 242 are criminal statutes that ‘do not provide for a private right of action.’” Chaney v. Races & Aces, 590 F. App’x 327, 330 (5th Cir. 2014) (per curiam) (quoting Ali v. Shabazz, 8 F.3d 22, 22 (5th Cir. 1993)).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Borne v. Home Bank, N.A.
M.D. La. · 2024 · confidence medium
Tex. Feb. 8, 2011) (“Not only has plaintiff failed to adequately plead a violation of any state or federal criminal statute, but he cannot maintain a private right of action as a result of any such violation.”). 22 Ali v. Shabazz, 8 F.3d 22, 22 (5th Cir. 1993) (internal quotations omitted). criminalize fraudulent and false statements generally;23 mail fraud and swindles;24 and fraud by wire, radio, or television.25 These statutes do not provide any statutory basis to conclude that a civil action can be brought by a private citizen.26 Because 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 , 1341, and 1343 do not crea…
cited Cited as authority (rule) Wesley III v. Neal
E.D. Tex. · 2024 · confidence medium
Appx. 551 , 555 (5th Cir. 2020) (citing Ali v. Shabazz, 8 F.3d 22, 22 (5th Cir. 1993)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Dillon v. Jobert
E.D. La. · 2024 · confidence medium
Feb. 3, 2022) (citing Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington, 442 U.S. 560, 575 (1979)). 50 Ali v. Shabazz, 8 F.3d 22, 22 (5th Cir. 1993) (internal quotations omitted). 51 R.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Hebert v. Central Intelligence Agency
W.D. La. · 2021 · confidence medium
Criminal statutes generally do not create a private right of action; therefore, there must be a statutory basis for a private right of action to exist under a criminal statute.29 Further, a private citizen has no constitutional right to have someone criminally prosecuted.30 “[D]ecisions whether to prosecute or file criminal charges are generally within the prosecutor's discretion, and, as a private citizen, [a plaintiff] 29 See Ali v. Shabazz, 8 F.3d 22, 22 (5th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (unpublished). 30 Oliver v. Collins, 914 F.2d 56, 60 (5th Cir. 1990).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Dunlap v. City of Fort Worth
N.D. Tex. · 2020 · confidence medium
Indeed, “[i]n order for a private right of action to exist under a criminal statute,” the Supreme Court requires “‘a statutory basis for inferring that a civil cause of action of some sort lay in favor of someone.’” Ali v. Shabazz, 8 F.3d 22, 22 (5th Cir. 1993) (unpublished) (quoting Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66, 79 (1975)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Tony Chaney v. Races and Aces
5th Cir. · 2014 · confidence medium
Sections 241 and 242 are criminal statutes that “do not provide for a private right of action.” Ali v. Shabazz, 8 F.3d 22, 22 (5th Cir.1993).
cited Cited "see" Brady v. Gonzales
W.D. Tex. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ali v. Shabazz, 8 F.3d 22 (5th Cir. 1993); Oliver v. Collins, 904 F.2d 278, 281 (5th Cir. 1990).
cited Cited "see" Max-George v. Houston Police Department
S.D. Tex. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ali v. Shabazz, 8 F.3d 22, 22 (5th Cir. 1993); see also Oliver v. Collins, 914 F.2d 56, 60 (5th Cir. 1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dixon v. The Texas Department of Public Safety
S.D. Tex. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low
Co., 281 F.2d 298, 303 (5th Cir. 1960)); see also Ali v. Shabazz, 8 F.3d 22 , 1993 WL 456323, at *1 (5th Cir. Oct. 28, 1993) (recognizing that § 242 does not provide for a private right of action and so there is no statutory basis for inferring that it could support a civil cause of action).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Smith v. Collier
S.D. Tex. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
Co., 281 F.2d 298, 303 (Sth Cir. 1960)); see also Ali v. Shabazz, 8 F.3d 22 , 1993 WL 456323, at *1 (Sth Cir. Oct. 28, 1993) (recognizing that neither § 241 nor § 242 provide for a private right of action and that there is no statutory basis for inferring that they could support a civil cause of action).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dedrick
v.
Eggleston
93-8571.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Oct 27, 1993.
8 F.3d 22

8 F.3d 22

Dedrick
v.
Eggleston[*]

NO. 93-8571

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Oct 27, 1993

1

Appeal From: W.D.Tex.

2

DISMISSED.

*

Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2