Hertz Corp. v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc., 10 F.3d 768 (11th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Hertz Corp. v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc., 10 F.3d 768 (11th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Robles v. Comm'r Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 6:20-cv-01663 (D. Or. Dec. 7, 2021)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 775 cited at this page1 citing case
  • LeSEA Inc v. LeSEA Broad. Corp., No. 3:18-cv-00914 (N.D. Ind. Mar. 3, 2022).
    I.A.E., Inc. v. Shaver, 74 10 F.3d 768, 775-76 (7th Cir. 1996); Falcon Enterprises, Inc. v. Publishers Services, Inc., 438 Fed.Appx. 579, 581 (9th Cir. 2011).
At page 821 cited at this page1 citing case
  • In Re: NFL Players' Concussion v., No. 18-2012 (3d Cir. May 7, 2020).unpublished
    Litig., 55 9 The District Court’s rejection of the proposed hourly rates as unreasonable and its application of a blended rate is just one way it showed that Seeger did not have special influence over this process. 10 F.3d 768, 821 (3d Cir…
Other citing cases2 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The Hertz Corporation
v.
Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc., Leonard Solomon, Dollar Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc., Sundance Carriage Corp., Atlas Rent-A-Car, Inc., Enterprise Leasing Co., Value Rent-A-Car, Inc., Vehicle Management Services, Inc.
92-4383.
Docket on CourtListener (RECAP)
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Mar 21, 1994.
Published opinion
10 F.3d 768
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published

10 F.3d 768w

27 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1273

The HERTZ CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ALAMO RENT-A-CAR, INC., Leonard Solomon, Dollar Rent-A-Car
Systems, Inc., Sundance Carriage Corp., Atlas Rent-A-Car,
Inc., Enterprise Leasing Co., Value Rent-A-Car, Inc.,
Vehicle Management Services, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-4383.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 3, 1994.
Opinion Vacated and Withdrawn on Denial of Rehearing March 21, 1994.

1

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION. SEE 16 F.3d 1126.