Gates v. City of Hartford, 121 A.2d 625 (Conn. 1956). · Go Syfert
Search
Gates v. City of Hartford, 121 A.2d 625 (Conn. 1956). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Estate of Curry (washctapp, 1999-11-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In Re Estate of Curry
Wash. Ct. App. · 1999 · confidence medium
Id. at 628-29. 8 Here, the trial court reviewed and cited in its memoran *118 dum decision a Washington case interpreting the words “special request,” In re Estate of Hochbrunn, 138 Wash. 415, 416 , 244 E 698, 49 A.L.R. 7 (1926).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Rosser v. Prem
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1982 · confidence medium
Some of the titles were "Ertogenesis ofReligion,” "Divinity in Semen,” "Why Priests Don’t Marry,” and "Phallic Worship to Secularized Sex.’’Later titles focused on the same and related subjects — "The Love-Hate Complex,” "Three Attitudes Toward Sex,” "Sadism in Mormonism,” and "Sanctified Lust.” Associate Justice O’Sullivan declared that a trust to "distribute articles which reek of the sewer” will not be held valid, remarking that his reading of one of the articles was "a truly nauseating experience in the field of pornography.” Fidelity Title & Trust Co. v. Clyde,…
cited Cited "see" Phillips v. Estate of Holzmann
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See The Fidelity Title and Trust Co. v. Clyde, 121 A.2d at 630 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Florence E. Gates
v.
City of Hartford
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 16, 1956.
121 A.2d 625
1956 Conn. LEXIS 164
Horace E. Rockwell, for the appellant (plaintiff)., Frank A. Murphy, with whom, on the brief, were John J. Kenny and Alexander A. Ooldfarb, for the appellees (named defendant et al.).
Baldwin.
Published
Baldwin, J.

The basic facts in this case are similar to those in Sullivan v. Town Council, decided this day, and they present the identical legal question. The decision of that case controls the decision of this one.

[*290] There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded with direction to deny the motion to erase.

In this opinion the other judges concurred.