green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Rosen v. Kore Holdings, Inc. (In Re Rood)
See In re Rood, 426 B.R. at 557 -58 (citing In re Wood & Locker, Inc., 25 F.3d 1045 , 1994 WL 261251 , at *2 (5th Cir.1994) (unpublished) (appeal from bankruptcy order disposing of some, but not all, claims reviewable where bankruptcy court certifies its dismissal as a final order pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7054 and expressly finds "no just reason for delay”) (quoting Matter of Wood & Locker, Inc., 868 F.2d 139, 144 (5th Cir.1989)); see also In re Chateaugay Corp., 922 F.2d 86 , 91 (2nd Cir.1990) (applying Rule 54(b) to adversary proceedings by virtue of Bankruptcy Rule 7054, which incorpor…
discussed
Cited "see"
Kore Holdings, Inc. v. Rosen
See In re Wood & Locker, Inc., 25 F.3d 1045 , 1994 WL 261251 , at *2 (5th Cir.1994) (unpublished) (appeal from bankruptcy order disposing of some, but not all, claims reviewable where bankruptcy court certifies its dismissal as a final order pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7054 and expressly finds “no just reason for delay”) (quoting Matter of Wood & Locker, Inc., 868 F.2d 139, 144 (5th Cir.1989)); see also In re Chateaugay Corp., 922 F.2d 86 , 91 (2nd Cir.1990) (applying Rule 54(b) to adversary proceedings by virtue of Bankruptcy Rule 7054, which incorporates Rule 54(b)); In re Boca Arena, In…
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Rood
See In re Wood & Locker, Inc., 25 F.3d 1045 , 1994 WL 261251 , at *2 (5th Cir.1994) (unpublished) (appeal from bankruptcy order disposing of some, but not all, claims reviewable where bankruptcy court certifies its dismissal as a final order pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7054 and expressly finds "no just reason for delay") (quoting Matter of Wood & Locker, Inc., 868 F.2d 139, 144 (5th Cir. 1989)); see also In re Chateaugay Corp., 922 F.2d 86 , 91 (2nd Cir.1990) (applying Rule 54(b) to adversary proceedings by virtue of Bankruptcy Rule 7054, which incorporates Rule 54(b)); In re Boca Arena, *558 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Enigma Software Group USA, LLC v. Malwarebytes Inc.
See SAC ¶ 1; see also Enigma I, 946 25 F.3d at 1045 (noting, in evaluating applicability of Section 230, that the action differed from other 26 cases “in that here the parties are competitors”). 27 1 c.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hernandez
v.
Collins
v.
Collins
93-08866.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jun 10, 1994.
Published
Hernandez
v.
Collins
NO. 93-08866
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
June 10, 1994
1
Appeal From: W.D.Tex.
2
AFFIRMED.