v.
Judd
Judgment — That the declaration is sufficient, it contains substantially a good consideration; that is, forbearance and stopping said suits by attachment: a clear and certain promise,[*458] viz. that said HaLlet’s note should uot be put in suit until the then next winter; and a breach by putting it in suit on the 1st of July after; all the rest being surplusage might better haye been omitted, and may well be rejected.