No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ronald Eugene KERSEY, Defendant-Appellant
v.
Ronald Eugene KERSEY, Defendant-Appellant
08-16650.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Jun 15, 2009.
Unpublished opinion
326 F. App'x 562
Ronald Eugene Kersey, Edgefield, SC, pro se., Amy Lee Copeland, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Savannah, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Birch, Black, Hull, Per Curiam.
Unpublished
PER CURIAM:
Robert Paul Phillips, III, appointed counsel for Ronald Eugene Kersey in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is[*563] GRANTED, and Kersey’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.