State v. Crumlin, 94 S.E.2d 842 (N.C. 1956). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Crumlin, 94 S.E.2d 842 (N.C. 1956). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
ELOISE CRUMLIN
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 31, 1956.
Published opinion
94 S.E.2d 842
1956 N.C. LEXIS 506
Attorney-General Patton and Assistant Attorney-General McGalliard for the State. , Buford T. Henderson for defendant.
Johnson.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
. Per Curiam.

The evidence adduced in the trial below is sufficient to support the verdict, and the assignments of error point out no error that would justify a new trial. Moreover, the exceptions to the charge appear only in connection with the assignments of error; no exceptions were taken and set out in the record to the portions of the charge of which the defendant complains. Therefore, the assignments of error relating to the charge have no exceptions upon which such assignments may rest. Barnette v. Woody, 242 N.C. 424, 88 S.E. 2d 223; S. v. Taylor, 240 N.C. 117, 80 S.E. 2d 917. .

No error.

Johnson, J., not sitting.