Phillips v. A Triangle Women's Health Clinic, Inc., 597 S.E.2d 669 (N.C. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Phillips v. A Triangle Women's Health Clinic, Inc., 597 S.E.2d 669 (N.C. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Under fire: who is questioning this case
Citations from separate opinions of courts that could overrule this case. This is a warning signal, not a treatment change. The flag color above is unaffected.
Concurrence Sykes v. Health Network Solutions, Inc., 828 S.E.2d 467 (N.C. 2019)
“"The rendering of a professional service is limited **347 to the performance of work '[c]onforming to the standards of a profession' and 'commanded or paid for by another.' " Phillips v. A Triangle Women's Health Clinic, Inc. , 155 N.C. App. 372 , 381, 573 S.E.2d 600 , 605 (2002) (citations omitted), aff'd per curiam in part and disc. rev. improvidently allowed in part , 357 N.C. 576 , 597…”
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MICHELLE BATTLE PHILLIPS
v.
A TRIANGLE WOMEN'S HEALTH CLINIC, INC. and STUART L. SCHNIDER, M.D.
No. 81A03.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Nov 7, 2003.
Published opinion
597 S.E.2d 669
2003 N.C. LEXIS 1258
Burford & Lewis, PLLC, by Robert J. Burford and James W. Vaughan, for plaintiff-appellant and -appellee. , Yates, McLamb & Weyher, L.L.P, by John W. Minier, for defendant-appellant and -appellee Stuart L. Schnider, M.D.
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.