Resolution Trust Corp., as Receiver for Broadview Fed. Sav. Bank, & Sentinel Communities, Inc., D/B/A Hidden Harbor Dev. Co. v. Town of Highland Beach, Resolution Trust Corp. as Receiver for Broadview Fed. Sav. Bank, Sentinel Communities, Inc., D/B/A Hidden Harbor Dev. Co. v. Town of Highland Beach, 42 F.3d 626 (11th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Resolution Trust Corp., as Receiver for Broadview Fed. Sav. Bank, & Sentinel Communities, Inc., D/B/A Hidden Harbor Dev. Co. v. Town of Highland Beach, Resolution Trust Corp. as Receiver for Broadview Fed. Sav. Bank, Sentinel Communities, Inc., D/B/A Hidden Harbor Dev. Co. v. Town of Highland Beach, 42 F.3d 626 (11th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: New Port Largo, Inc. v. Monroe County (ca11, 1996-09-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" New Port Largo, Inc. v. Monroe County
11th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Resolution Trust Corp. v. Town of Highland Beach, 18 F.3d 1536, 1550 (11th Cir.1994), vacated, 42 F.3d 626 (11th Cir.1994) (“[T]he court determines all issues, legal and factual, in an inverse condemnation suit, save the question of just compensation_”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd. v. City of Monterey, Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd., and Monterey-Del Monte Dunes Corporation v. City of Monterey
9th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Resolution Trust Corp. v. Town of Highland Beach, 18 F.3d 1536 , 1549-50 & n. 9 (11th Cir.), vacated and reh’g en banc granted, 42 F.3d 626 (11th Cir.1994); Yancey v. United States, 915 F.2d 1534, 1541 (Fed.Cir.1990) (no set formula for determining how much diminution in value effects a taking); Bowles v. United States, 31 Fed.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for Broadview Federal Savings Bank, and Sentinel Communities, Inc., D/B/A Hidden Harbor Development Company
v.
Town of Highland Beach, Resolution Trust Corporation as Receiver for Broadview Federal Savings Bank, Sentinel Communities, Inc., D/B/A Hidden Harbor Development Company v. Town of Highland Beach
92-4462.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Dec 29, 1994.
42 F.3d 626
Published

42 F.3d 626

RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, as Receiver for Broadview
Federal Savings Bank, and Sentinel Communities,
Inc., d/b/a Hidden Harbor Development
Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
TOWN OF HIGHLAND BEACH, Defendant-Appellant.
RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION as Receiver for Broadview
Federal Savings Bank, Sentinel Communities, Inc.,
d/b/a Hidden Harbor Development Company,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
TOWN OF HIGHLAND BEACH, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 92-4462, 92-5097.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Dec. 29, 1994.

Patrice A. Talisman, Sam Daniels, Paul, Landy, Beiley & Harper, P.A., Miami, FL, George P. Roberts, Jr., George R. Roberts, Sr., Roberts & Reynolds, West Palm Beach, FL, for appellant.

John C. Dotterrer, Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts, Palm Beach, FL, Margaret L. Cooper, Jones, Foster, Johnston & Stubbs, P.A., West Palm Beach, FL, for appellees in both cases.

Randee S. Schatz, Palm Beach, FL, for appellees in No. 92-4462.

Michael J. Kennedy, Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts, Palm Beach, FL, for appellees in No. 92-5097.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Nos. 87-8483-CIV-WJZ(JM), 87-8483-CIV-WJZ), Jacob Mishler, Judge, Sitting by Designation and William J. Zloch, Judge.

PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion April 19, 1994, 11th Cir., 1994, 18 F.3d 1536).

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.