United States v. Story, 334 F. App'x 709 (5th Cir. 2009). · Go Syfert
United States v. Story, 334 F. App'x 709 (5th Cir. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Story
08-10758.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Oct 20, 2009.
Unpublished opinion
334 F. App'x 709
Unpublished
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit

FILED
October 20, 2009
No. 08-10758
Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JEFFREY COREINN STORY,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:02-CR-3-ALL

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
[*~709–710]

PER CURIAM:*

Jeffrey Coreinn Story, federal prisoner # 28236-177, was sentenced to 210 months of imprisonment after pleading guilty to possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine. Following amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines that lowered the offense levels for crack cocaine offenses, the district court granted a motion by Story pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and reduced his sentence to 168 months, at the bottom of the amended guidelines range. Story now appeals, challenging the limits on the district court’s discretion set forth in

*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4.

No. 08-10758

U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, and arguing that the district court had the authority to impose an even lower sentence. The Government argues that the district court could not reduce Story’s sentence further.

Story’s arguments are foreclosed in light of our recent decision in United States v. Doublin, 572 F.3d 235, 236-39 (5th Cir. 2009), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 21, 2009) (No. 09-6657). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.