State ex rel. Held v. Indus. Comm'n, 570 N.E.2d 274 (Ohio 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
State ex rel. Held v. Indus. Comm'n, 570 N.E.2d 274 (Ohio 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
[The State, ex rel.] Held
v.
Industrial Commission of Ohio
No. 90-1894.
Ohio Supreme Court.
Apr 24, 1991.
Published opinion
570 N.E.2d 274
1991 Ohio LEXIS 948
Butler, Cincione, DiCuccio & Dritz and David B. Barnhart, for appellant., Lee I. Fisher, attorney general, Michael L. Squillace and Teresa OglesbyMcIntyre, for appellee Industrial Commission., Baker & Hostetler, R. Christopher Doyle and Stephen J. Habash, for appellee Worthington Board of Education.
Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright.
Published
Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in State, ex rel. Noll, v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St. 3d 203, 567 N.E. 2d 245, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and issue a limited writ returning the cause to the commission to identify the nonmedical disability factors on which it relied and to briefly explain the reasons for its decision.

Judgment reversed and limited writ issued.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.