Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Baer, 607 N.E.2d 8 (Ohio 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Baer, 607 N.E.2d 8 (Ohio 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Columbus Bar Association
v.
Baer
No. 91-2502.
Ohio Supreme Court.
Jan 20, 1993.
Published opinion
607 N.E.2d 8
Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright.
Published

On Application for Reinstatement.

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Christopher J. Baer, Attorney Registration No. 0010166.

The court coming now to consider its order of June 17, 1992, suspending respondent, Christopher J. Baer, from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(7)(c) (now Rule V[6][B]), finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A) (formerly Rule V[24]). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that Christopher J. Baer be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1).

For earlier case, see (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 32, 591 N.E.2d 1209.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.