In re R.A.H., 2016-Ohio-7592, 71 N.E.3d 1015. · Go Syfert
Search
In re R.A.H., 2016-Ohio-7592, 71 N.E.3d 1015. Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: In re D.F., 2022-Ohio-3436, 198 N.E.3d 126
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
  • In re D.F., 2022-Ohio-3436, 198 N.E.3d 126.published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re R.A.H.
No. 2015-1610.
Ohio Supreme Court.
Nov 3, 2016.
Published opinion
71 N.E.3d 1015
Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Brooke M. Burns, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant, R.A.H.
Connor, Donnell, French, Kennedy, Lanzinger, Neill, Pfeifer, Re, Stated, Would.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals as to proposition of law No. I is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals to apply In re A.G., 148 Ohio St.3d 118, 2016-Ohio-3306, 69 N.E.3d 646.

{¶2} Proposition of law No. II is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. O’Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., dissent and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in In re AG.