Bekins v. Merced Irrigation Dist., 89 F.2d 1002 (9th Cir. 1937). · Go Syfert
Search
Bekins v. Merced Irrigation Dist., 89 F.2d 1002 (9th Cir. 1937). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for
q1 “a decree be filed and entered reversing the decree of said district court, and remanding the cause with directions to dismiss the cause”0 citing cases1 citing court quotes it · Neutral (inherited from the case)
    Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
    Reed J. Bekins
    v.
    Merced Irrigation District
    No. 8165.
    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
    Apr 12, 1937.
    Published opinion
    89 F.2d 1002
    1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3661
    Maurice Harrison, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, turn Suden & turn Suden, and Hugh K. McKevitt, all of San Francisco, Cal., Clark, Nichols & Eltse, of Berkeley, Cal, W. Coburn Cook, of Turlock, Cal., Gillett & Gillett, of Oakland, Cal., and Charles L. Childers, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants., Downey, Brand & Seymour, of Sacramento, Cal., Hugh K. Landram and C. Ray Robinson, both of Merced, Cal., and Orriclc, Palmer & Dahlquist, of San Francisco, Cal, for appellees.
    Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
    PER CURIAM.

    Upon motion of appellants for advancement of cause for hearing, and for reversal of decree of the District Court herein, and after oral arguments thereon, ordered said motion granted, that a decree be filed and entered reversing' the decree of said District Court, and remanding the cause with directions to dismiss the cause; mandate to issue in 40 days.