Milburn & Semmes v. Watson Realty Co., 119 F.2d 784 (6th Cir. 1941). · Go Syfert
Milburn & Semmes v. Watson Realty Co., 119 F.2d 784 (6th Cir. 1941). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of WATSON REALTY CO., Debtor. MILBURN & SEMMES
v.
WATSON REALTY COMPANY
No. 8830.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
May 7, 1941.
Published opinion
119 F.2d 784
1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3857
Milburn & Semmes, of Detroit, Mich., in pro. per., Harris W. Wienner and Bulkley, Led-yard, Dickinson & Wright, all of Detroit, Mich., for appellee.
Published
PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and the briefs and oral arguments of counsel; and it appearing to the court that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in disallowing appellant’s application for compensation, Woods v. City National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, 312 U.S. 262, 61 S.Ct. 493, 85 L.Ed. -, decided February 3, 1941; Dickinson Industrial Site v. Cowan, 309 U.S. 382, 389, 60 S.Ct. 595, 84 L.Ed. 819; Butzel v. Webster Apartments Co., 6 Cir., 112 F.2d 362, 366, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order appealed from is affirmed.