No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AMERICAN AIR FILTER CO., Inc.
v.
AIR-MAZE CORPORATION
v.
AIR-MAZE CORPORATION
No. 9035.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Jun 2, 1942.
Published opinion
Hadley F. Freeman and Freeman, Sweet & Albrecht, all of Cleveland, Ohio, and Arthur F. Robert, of Louisville, Ky., for appellant., George S. Baldwin and Hyde & Meyer, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.
Published
PER CURIAM.
This cause having been submitted and considered upon the record, briefs and oral argument, and it appearing that the judgment of the District Court dismissing appellant’s suit for infringement of patent, No. 1,521,575, for a viscous air filter, and holding that claims 3 and 6 of said patent were not infringed, was correct for the reasons stated by the District Court in its opinion filed May 15, 1940, 45 F.Supp. 977; and it further appearing that, in this view of the[*199] case, the defense of laches which was also sustained below becomes immaterial.
It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court dismissing the bill of complaint be, and it hereby is, affirmed.