King Instruments Corp. v. Luciano Perego & Tapematic, Defendant/cross-Appellants, 59 F.3d 163 (Fed. Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
King Instruments Corp. v. Luciano Perego & Tapematic, Defendant/cross-Appellants, 59 F.3d 163 (Fed. Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
King Instruments Corporation
v.
Luciano Perego and Tapematic, Defendant/cross-Appellants
91-1125.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Jul 10, 1995.
59 F.3d 163
Published

59 F.3d 163

KING INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Luciano PEREGO and Tapematic, Defendant/Cross-Appellants.

Nos. 91-1125, 91-1132.

United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.

July 10, 1995.

David J. Brezner, Richard F. Trecartin and Richard P. Doyle, Jr., Flehr, Hohbach, Test, Albritton & Herbert, San Francisco, CA, were on the brief for plaintiff-appellant. Also on the brief was Nicholas A. Pandiscio, Schiller, Pandiscio & Kusmer, of Cambridge, MA, of counsel.

Edgar H. Haug, Adam L. Brookman and Mary Ann G. Mullen, Curtis, Morris & Safford, P.C., New York City, were on the brief for defendant/cross-appellants.

Before ARCHER, Chief Judge, RICH, NIES, NEWMAN, MAYER, MICHEL, PLAGER, LOURIE, CLEVENGER, RADER, SCHALL, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

1

The appeals, having originally been submitted to a panel of the court and, thereafter, it having been ordered that the appeals should be decided en banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that the appeals shall be decided by the panel to which they were originally submitted.