green
Positive treatment
published
2.3 score
Cited for
At page 468 cited at this page1 citing case
- In the Matter of Am. Healthcare Mgmt., Inc., a Delaware Corp., Debtor. Chapman Inv. Assocs. v. Am. Healthcare Mgmt., 900 F.2d 827 (5th Cir. 1990).publishedCo. v. Phillips, 196 F.2d 692, 694 (5th Cir.1952); Dulaney v. Coppard, 145 F.2d 468, 468 (5th Cir.1944), cert. denied, 325 U.S. 861 , 65 S.Ct. 1199 , 89 L.Ed. 1982 (1945); see also In re Semel, 427 F.2d 651, 653-54 (3d Cir.1970) (citing ca…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DULANEY
v.
COPPARD
v.
COPPARD
No. 10878.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Nov 18, 1944.
Published opinion
Albert Covington Dulaney, of San Antonio, Tex., in pro. per., Herbert Davis, of San Antonio, Tex., for appellee.
Hutcheson, Lee, Waller.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM.
The order appealed from was well within, and was a proper exercise of, the referee’s authority. There is no merit whatever in the bankrupt’s contention that the action of the referee in entering the extension order without first giving the bankrupt notice of his intention to enter it deprived the bankrupt of due process. The statute does not make notice to the bankrupt a condition of entering such orders. There is no evidence whatever that the entry of the order, without first notifying the bankrupt, deprived him of any constitutional right. The order appealed from is affirmed.