Cantwell v. United States, 163 F.2d 782 (4th Cir. 1947). · Go Syfert
Search
Cantwell v. United States, 163 F.2d 782 (4th Cir. 1947). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Statutes interpreted (leading-cases list)
#12 18 U.S.C. § 399 cited 1× in this case · 17 total citations of statute
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CANTWELL
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 5641.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Oct 8, 1947.
Published opinion
163 F.2d 782
1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2318
Carl G. Bachmann and Frank A. O’Brien, both of Wheeling, W. Va., for appellants., Wayne T. Brooks, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Wheeling, W. Va. (C. Lee Spillers, U. S. Atty., of Wheeling, W. Va., on the brief), for appellee.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a sentence entered upon a plea of guilty of violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 399. The only question presented by the appeal is whether the court abused its discretion in refusing to permit appellants to withdraw their plea of guilty. No abuse of discretion is shown. On the contrary, the evidence before the court was clearly sufficient to establish guilt on the part of appellants and they offered no evidence to establish their innocence.

Affirmed.