Cook v. Workers' Comp. Dep't, 742 P.2d 714 (Or. Ct. App. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
Cook v. Workers' Comp. Dep't, 742 P.2d 714 (Or. Ct. App. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1988 · …a challenge to an administrative rule in this court is an original proceeding, and our determination of the rule's validity should, 856 generally, be by written opinion. ✓
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1992 · 2 courts · …a challenge to an administrative rule in this court is an original proceeding, and our determination of the rule's validity should, generally, be by written opinion. ✓
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1988 · …we have considered petitioner's arguments challenging the validity of oar 436-10-050 and find them to be without merit. ✓
8 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COOK, dba Gresham Health Center Nurse Practitioner Clinic
v.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION DEPARTMENT
WCD 6-1985; CA A38782.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Sep 16, 1987.
742 P.2d 714
1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 4645
Hoomissen, Young.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM

In this challenge to a rule of the Workers’ Compensation Department brought under ORS 183.400, petitioner seeks review of our decision, which “affirmed” without opinion. Cook v. Workers’ Compensation Dept., 85 Or App 219, 736 P2d 230 (1987). We consider the petition for review as one for reconsideration. ORAP 10.10. We allow reconsideration and uphold the rule.

A challenge to an administrative rule in this court is an original proceeding, and our determination of the rule’s validity should, generally, be by written opinion. Cook v. Workers’ Compensation Dept., 79 Or App 21, 717 P2d 658, rev den 301 Or 666 (1986).

We have considered petitioner’s arguments challenging the validity of OAR 436-10-050 and find them to be without merit.

Reconsideration allowed; rule upheld.