challenge to an administrative rule (Oregon) · Go Syfert
← Oregon issues

challenge to an administrative rule in Oregon

5 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Hay v. Oregon Department of Transportation green
or · 1986
2 sentences

2011In the process of reaching that decision, the court rejected the plaintiffs argument that the circuit court had jurisdiction under the rule of Hay v. Dept. of Transportation, 301 Or 129, 138 , 719 P2d 860 (1986): A circuit court has jurisdiction to consider a challenge to an administrative rule when the rule’s validity is “at issue” in a “separate civil action” properly before the circuit court.

2011In the process of reaching that decision, the court rejected the plaintiffs argument that the circuit court had jurisdiction under the rule of Hay v. Dept. of Transportation, 301 Or 129, 138 , 719 P2d 860 (1986): A circuit court has jurisdiction to consider a challenge to an administrative rule when the rule’s validity is “at issue” in a “separate civil action” properly before the circuit court.

22002–2011
Nay v. Department of Human Services green
or · 2016
2 sentences

2017Nay v. Dept. of Human Services , 360 Or. 668 , 680-81, 385 P.3d 1001 ( 2016).

2017Nay v. Dept. of Human Services , 360 Or. 668 , 680-81, 385 P.3d 1001 ( 2016).

12017–2017
Cook v. Workers' Compensation Department green
or · 1988
2 sentences

1992“A challenge to an administrative rule in this court is an original proceeding, and our determination of the rule’s validity should, generally, be by written opinion.” Cook v. Workers’ Compensation Department, 87 Or App 486 , 742 P2d 714 (1987), rev’d on other grounds 306 Or 134 , 758 P2d 854 (1988).

1992“A challenge to an administrative rule in this court is an original proceeding, and our determination of the rule’s validity should, generally, be by written opinion.” Cook v. Workers’ Compensation Department, 87 Or App 486 , 742 P2d 714 (1987), rev’d on other grounds 306 Or 134 , 758 P2d 854 (1988).

11992–1992
Cook v. Workers' Compensation Department neutral
orctapp · 1987
2 sentences

1992“A challenge to an administrative rule in this court is an original proceeding, and our determination of the rule’s validity should, generally, be by written opinion.” Cook v. Workers’ Compensation Department, 87 Or App 486 , 742 P2d 714 (1987), rev’d on other grounds 306 Or 134 , 758 P2d 854 (1988).

1992“A challenge to an administrative rule in this court is an original proceeding, and our determination of the rule’s validity should, generally, be by written opinion.” Cook v. Workers’ Compensation Department, 87 Or App 486 , 742 P2d 714 (1987), rev’d on other grounds 306 Or 134 , 758 P2d 854 (1988).

11992–1992
Cook v. Workers' Compensation Department green
orctapp · 1986
2 sentences

1987Cook v. Workers’ Compensation Dept., 79 Or App 21 , 717 P2d 658 , rev den 301 Or 666 (1986).

1987Cook v. Workers’ Compensation Dept., 79 Or App 21 , 717 P2d 658 , rev den 301 Or 666 (1986).

11987–1987

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.400 (5)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OR 5 (1987–2017) TX 2 (2014–2014) AL 2 (2004–2007)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check