Day v. Deschutes Cnty. Commc'n Agency, 820 P.2d 464 (Or. Ct. App. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Day v. Deschutes Cnty. Commc'n Agency, 820 P.2d 464 (Or. Ct. App. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
In the Matter of the Compensation of Sheryl Day, Sheryl DAY
v.
DESCHUTES COUNTY COMMUNICATION AGENCY and SAIF Corporation
90-04891; CA A69729.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Nov 27, 1991.
Published opinion
820 P.2d 464
1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1805
Philip H. Garrow, Bend, filed the brief for petitioner., Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Thomas E. Ewing, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondents.
Deits, Joseph, Richardson.
Published
PER CURIAM

Respondents concede that the Workers’ Compensation Board erred in denying claimant a reasonable attorney fee. We accept the concession. ORS 656.386(1); Jones v. OSCI, 108 Or App 230, 814 P2d 558 (1991).

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.