Dewitt v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 862 P.2d 1316 (Or. Ct. App. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Dewitt v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 862 P.2d 1316 (Or. Ct. App. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BRIAN E. DEWITT
v.
BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
CA A73777.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Nov 3, 1993.
862 P.2d 1316
1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1838
Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Lawrence J. Hall, Public Defender., Harrison Latto, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.
Deits, Edmonds, Warren.
Published
PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision order that deferred his parole release date for 18 months after he violated his parole. ORS 144.335. He argues that the Board’s reliance on documents not disclosed to him during a prison term hearing violates his rights under Article I, sections 10 and 11, of the Oregon Constitution, and the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

We have decided the issues presented by petitioner contrary to his position. Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331, 862 P2d 1312 (1993).

Petitioner’s other arguments do not require discussion.

Affirmed.