Alphonzo Bates v. P.L. Huffman, 66 F.3d 315 (4th Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Alphonzo Bates v. P.L. Huffman, 66 F.3d 315 (4th Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
45 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Stone v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (wvsd, 1999-02-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see, e.g." Stone v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
S.D.W. Va · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Bowman v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., 832 F.Supp. 1014 (D.S.C.1993), aff'd mem., 66 F.3d 315 (4th Cir.1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alphonzo Bates
v.
P.L. Huffman
95-7045.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Sep 19, 1995.
66 F.3d 315
Unpublished

66 F.3d 315

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Alphonzo BATES, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
P.L. HUFFMAN, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-7045.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 24, 1995.
Decided: Sept. 19, 1995.

Alphonzo Bates, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Bates v. Huffman, No. CA-93-336 (E.D. Va. June 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.