State v. Spiak, 135 P.3d 396 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Spiak, 135 P.3d 396 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Drew Spiak, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON
v.
DREW SPIAK
0506-66137; A128962.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
May 10, 2006.
135 P.3d 396
2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 616
Kirkland T. Roberts filed the brief for appellant., Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Denise G. Fjordbeck, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Brewer, Haselton, Rosenblum.
Published
PER CURIAM

Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing him to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and is dangerous to himself. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that appellant is dangerous to himself. A discussion of the facts would be of no benefit to the bench, the bar, or the public. On de novo review, we find the state’s concession to be well-founded and therefore accept it.

Reversed.