Chultem v. Ticor Title Ins. Co., 2017 IL 120448, 89 N.E.3d 675. · Go Syfert
Chultem v. Ticor Title Ins. Co., 2017 IL 120448, 89 N.E.3d 675. Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Doljin Chultem, and
v.
Ticor Title Insurance Company, and
Docket No. 120448.
Illinois Supreme Court.
May 18, 2017.
Published opinion
89 N.E.3d 675
2017 Ill. LEXIS 457
Todd A. Smith and Joseph A. Power, Jr., of Power Rogers & Smith, PC, Stephen M. Tillery, George A. Zelcs, and John A. Libra, of Korein Tillery LLC, and Myron M. Cherry and Jacie Zolna, of Myron M. Cherry & Associates, LLC, all of Chicago, for appellants., Craig C. Martin, Michael T. Brody, and Elin I. Park, of Jenner & Block LLP, Timothy M. Frey, of Skadden Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, both of Chicago, Scott C. Lascari, of Fidelity National Title & Chicago Title, of Carol Stream, and Robert J. Fogarty, Erica L. Calderas, and Dennis R. Rose, of Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellees.
Cited by 141 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM

¶ 1 In this case, one Justice of this court has recused himself, and the remaining members of the court are divided so that it is not possible to secure the constitutionally required concurrence of four judges for a decision (see Ill. Const. 1970, art. VI, § 3 ). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. The effect of this dismissal is the same as an affirmance by an equally divided court of the decision under review but is of no precedential value. See Perlman v. First National Bank of Chicago , 60 Ill.2d 529, 530, 331 N.E.2d 65 (1975).

¶ 2 THOMAS, J., took no part.