green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Fletcher v. Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development
(2×)
Working, pre- 66 See Deas v. River West, L.P., 152 F.3d 471, 481 (5th Cir. 1998)(defining the “major life activity of working” and citing to 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2 (j)(3)(i)); Brasfield v. Gilmore Memorial, 84 F.3d 431, at *2 (5th Cir. 1996)(listing working as a “major life activity” and stating that the plaintiff could still drive, implying it was a major life activity that she could still perform). 67 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2 (j)(1)(ii). 68 Mitchell, 265 Fed.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grant
Id. at *7 , citing In re Pakuris, 262 B.R. 330 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.2001) and In re Lilley, 91 F.3d 491 (3d Cir.1996); see also, In re Beard, 84 F.3d 431 (5th Cir.1996). 43 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Garza
v.
Garza
95-10413.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Apr 1, 1996.
Published
U.S.
v.
Garza[*]
NO. 95-10413
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Apr 01, 1996
Appeal From: N.D.Tex., No. 4:94-CR-101-A
1
AFFIRMED.
*
Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2