Michael Lee Scott v. Mike Kemna Dan Smith, Superintendent of Fulton Reception & Diagnostic Ctr. Denise Westhoff, 89 F.3d 841 (8th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Michael Lee Scott v. Mike Kemna Dan Smith, Superintendent of Fulton Reception & Diagnostic Ctr. Denise Westhoff, 89 F.3d 841 (8th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
50 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Larken, Inc. v. Dirk Wray (ca8, 1999-08-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Larken, Inc. v. Dirk Wray
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Larken Minnesota, Inc. v. Wray, 89 F.3d 841 (Table), No.95-2219, 1996 WL 362672 (8th Cir. July 1, 1996). -4- Larken a right to a priority return of its capital.5 Larken also asked the court to declare the particular amounts of the sales proceeds that Larken, Wray, and Yip should receive.
cited Cited "see" Larken, Inc. v. Dirk Wray, - Appellant., Al Yip
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Larken Minnesota, Inc. v. Wray, 89 F.3d 841 , 1996 WL 362672 (8th Cir.1996). 5 .
cited Cited "see" Marlise Grebenick v. Shirley S. Chater
8th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Prew v. Chater, 89 F.3d 841 (8th Cir.1996).
cited Cited "see" Ingalls v. Florio
D.N.J. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rust v. Clarke, 883 F.Supp. 1293, 1305 (D.Neb.1995), aff'd, 89 F.3d 841 (8th Cir.1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michael Lee Scott
v.
Mike Kemna Dan Smith, Superintendent of Fulton Reception and Diagnostic Center Denise Westhoff
96-1745.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
May 7, 1996.
89 F.3d 841
Unpublished

89 F.3d 841

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Michael Lee SCOTT, Appellant,
v.
Mike KEMNA; Dan Smith, Superintendent of Fulton Reception
and Diagnostic Center; Denise Westhoff, Appellees.

No. 96-1745.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted April 3, 1996.
Filed May 7, 1996.

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Michael Lee Scott, a Missouri inmate, appeals from the final order of the District Court[1] for the Western District of Missouri, dismissing with prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action claiming deliberate indifference to serious medical needs. The district court dismissed the action as to two defendant prison officials, concluding that Scott was suing them on the basis of respondeat superior. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the remaining defendant, concluding that Scott had not shown deliberate indifference and had merely disagreed with the course of his medical treatment. We have carefully reviewed the record, and we conclude the judgment of the district court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

1

The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri