No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ted KOGOS
v.
Louis J. RITTINER, Joseph W. Nelkin and Irwin, Selig & Nelkin
v.
Louis J. RITTINER, Joseph W. Nelkin and Irwin, Selig & Nelkin
No. 49707.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Feb 25, 1969.
Published opinion
Answer, Application, Because, Hamlin, Involved, Made, Ordered, Return, Should, That, Therefore, Trial.
Published
In re: Joseph W. Nelkin applying for writ of certiorari or review.
Writs refused. Applicant has an adequate remedy by appeal.
HAMLIN, J., is of the view that, because of the exceptional circumstances involved, and the showing made, the trial judge should be ordered to file a return or answer to the application. He therefore dissents at this time.